Navajo activist declares power plant project ‘dead’
By
Shadi Rahimi, Today correspondent
SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. – Elouise Brown is on a speaking tour
across the state, visiting a dozen communities to tell the story of her
battle against a coal-burning power plant proposal near her home in
Chaco Rio, N.M.
Photo courtesy Shadi Rahimi
Elouise Brown spoke at the Women’s Building in San Francisco March 20.
“I don’t care what anyone says – the project is dead. It’s not going to
happen as long as I live.”
It’s been three years since Brown launched a stand off against her
tribe, the Navajo Nation, to stop it from building a 1,500-megawatt
project called Desert Rock on land allotted to her family by the tribal
government. Last April, the Environmental Protection Agency withdrew the
air quality permit it had issued, which its opponents declared a
victory.
Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr. said the decision doesn’t mean
the project is cancelled. He said his government is continuing efforts
to obtain permits.
Meanwhile, Brown is being celebrated in activist circles, particularly
in California, where environmental and sacred site battles are at the
forefront of Native activism.
Brown’s battle began Dec. 11, 2006 after her parents discovered a
drilling site near her home. “There was a well head, trash and a rental
generator down a little ditch. Our cattle gates were left open and south
of the site we found orange survey flags.”
Two aging coal-burning plants, the Four Corners Power Plant and the San
Juan Generating Station, were already operating within a 20-mile radius
of Brown’s home. Together they belch more than half the state’s annual
57 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
Brown vowed, “Another plant will not be built here.”
She had no legal means to stop construction because there is no private
land ownership in Navajoland. When a contractor returned, Brown argued
with him until he left. She then built a fire. Her family helped set up a
makeshift blockade with a white tent and Brown called on her community
to help.
Some came, but she also found opposition from her people. The windows of
her truck and solar-powered home were smashed and her resistance camp, “Dooda (No)
Desert Rock,” was moved twice – once forcibly by tribal police and
once by Brown after it was trashed and a table was burnt.
Her main adversaries are more powerful: The Navajo’s utility company
proposed the power plant; Texas developers Sithe Global Power and Fluor
Corporation plan to spend $3 billion to build and operate it; and Navajo
legislators support a project that promises to bring 3,000 temporary
and 400 permanent jobs to a reservation where half the population is
unemployed.
The project is expected to bring $50 million a year in taxes, coal
royalties and other payments to fund almost one-third of the Navajo
Nation’s annual operating budget, Shirley said.
“Desert Rock remains the most important economic development project in
our Nation’s history,” he said. “It is a key to our saving self, to
ending our dependence on the federal government, and to regaining our
independence.”
Energy is hotly debated in Navajoland, which extends across swaths of
New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado and Utah and has 20 billion tons of coal
beneath it, one of the continent’s largest deposits. During his two
terms, Shirley has welcomed outsiders eager to excavate the energy-rich
land to lift his people out of poverty.
Even so, Desert Rock has been a hard sell in parts of the
26,600-square-mile reservation, where the history of tribal rule is
rooted in federal meddling, and traditionalists have long pushed for a
return to harmony with the terrain tended by goat and sheepherders,
ranchers, farmers and grandmothers revered as matriarchs.
“There’s so much potential here yet we’re still grasping for the old
post-industrial pollutants,” said Shonto Begay. “The old stories talk of
monsters and obstacles coming to annihilate us. Now we’re back battling
those monsters, rearing their ugly heads, making the whole area a toxic
stew. In this way we can’t have ‘hozhó,’ which in Navajo means beauty,
harmony, everything calm, serene and right.”
Desert Rock opponents often mention hozhó. It even appeared in a report
by the nonprofit Environmental Council of the States, which outlined the
likelihood of hazards and pollution from Desert Rock. The
“environmental wounds and historical trauma incurred from extractive
mining industry as a result of an imposed western energy paradigm,” must
be counterbalanced with sustainable technologies.
Brown’s opposition has taken shape as editorials, petitions circulated
among the 250,000 Navajo tribal members, and lobbying of the state
legislature against an $85 million state tax break for Desert Rock.
She quit her job to lobby, sleeping in her car and visiting every
legislator “until they were all tired of me.”
They began to recognize her Pendleton jacket, so she would stalk the
hallways and wave. If they waved back, they understood her position. If
they didn’t, she would approach them. When a chronic illness left her
temporarily paralyzed before the vote, her elderly mother helped her
walk so she could wave, she said.
“Only two people didn’t wave back.”
She emerged victorious: the tax break was defeated. Gov. Bill Richardson
visited her camp and slammed Desert Rock, saying it would “adversely
impact air quality, exacerbate existing environment problems, and
negatively impact scarce surface and groundwater resources.” Opponents
sent thousands of letters against the air quality permit the EPA would
withdraw.
Assistant New Mexico Attorney General Seth Cohen has called the
withdrawal a huge victory. At the same time, Cohen said the state will
work with the Navajo Nation to redraft the permit in response to
pollution concerns, environmental impacts and the lack of new emission
control technologies.
But Brown isn’t worried. By the time the permit comes up again, she
said, coal-burning power plants will be nearly obsolete.
“This story is not about me. This is about if you want to do anything,
you can get it done. We killed this power plant with faith, persistence
and resistance.”
Original story: http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national/southwest/89789732.html